in

 

Project role for allocated resources

Last post 05-15-2007 11:04 AM by emarone. 3 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 05-14-2007 8:00 AM

    Project role for allocated resources

    When our team managers allocate resources to a project, the resource is being added as a team member (good!) without any role (bad!). Can't image this is "working as designed" - anyone know if this is a bug or if I've just missed a setting somewhere?
  • 05-14-2007 11:46 AM In reply to

    • emarone
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 09-19-2006
    • Seattle, WA
    • Posts 283

    Re: Project role for allocated resources

    Do you have default project roles set up in your enterprise profiles?  You can specify what project role users should automatically inherit based on their enterprise role.  Otherwise, unless specified by their enterprise role, it is the responsibility of the Project Manager to manage project permissions for their project team.

    If you can think of a more appropriate, or alternate, way to manage this, please submit it as an enhancement suggestion!

    Erik Marone | Daptiv Product Manager
  • 05-15-2007 6:55 AM In reply to

    Re: Project role for allocated resources

    yes, the default role is set to Project Member. It is not locked, but I want people to be able to be updated to PM when appropriate. Is this what you mean?
  • 05-15-2007 11:04 AM In reply to

    • emarone
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 09-19-2006
    • Seattle, WA
    • Posts 283

    Re: Project role for allocated resources

    That's right.  If it's not automatically assigning them to the Member role when they're added, that sounds like a bug.  Be sure to let Support know that you do have default project roles associated with the enterprise role when you open the support case.
    Erik Marone | Daptiv Product Manager
Page 1 of 1 (4 items)

Navigate: Home | Blogs | Forums | Solution Library  Get Help:  Contact | Feedback | FAQ   Terms of Use:  Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy